Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matias Soto vs Christian Langmo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Soto vs Langmo analysis and find out who is favored!
Matias Soto vs Christian Langmo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Soto 1 - 0 Langmo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Soto has won 48.6% of points on his second serve, while Langmo has won 50.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Soto, in recent form, has won 51.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Langmo has won 49.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.15% and 29.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Soto has saved 58.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Langmo has saved 63.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Soto has won 56.45% of matches played (W/L 35/ 27), with Langmo winning 45.16% (W/L 28/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Soto has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 53/ 37). Langmo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 163/ 112), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Soto has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.1% of matches (W/L 23/ 18), where as Langmo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44% of matches (W/L 22/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Soto winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Soto winning 2 and Langmo winning 1. The last match between Soto and Langmo was at the M25 Waco, 16-10-2019, First, Hard with Matias Soto getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Soto and Langmo have played a deciding set 1 times, with Soto winning 1 times and Langmo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Soto winning 0, and Langmo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Soto has played against opponents with an average rank of 275.27 while Langmo has played against players with an average rank of 269.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Soto has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Langmo has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Soto has converted 43.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Langmo has converted 36.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
375
Rank
375
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
510
Rank
333
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
60% (91-61)
Career Total W/L
57% (203-152)
61% (17-11)
YTD W/L
55% (17-14)
$3,550
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matias Soto | Christian Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 12 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:24:0 | 2:24:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (68/102) | 63% (54/86) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (45/68) | 80% (43/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (19/34) | 34% (11/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 18% (2/11) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (32/86) | 37% (38/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Matias Soto
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
6
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
6
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
43 of
54)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matias Soto | Christian Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (17/11) | 55% (17/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (38/24) | 54% (41/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (315/287) | 52% (389/365) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 57% (12/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 50% (5/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.32 | 0.7 |
| Aces Total | 95 | 258 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 102 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:37 | 1:44:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 294.11 | 249.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1205/1924) | 62% (1402/2272) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (874/1205) | 75% (1058/1402) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (357/719) | 50% (436/870) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (74/166) | 36% (73/201) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (743/1921) | 37% (848/2301) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (12/9) | 57% (13/10) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (4/1) | 50% (4/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (17/28) | 55% (17/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 50% (7/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (19/16) | 72% (18/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 28% (18/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 31% (13/4) |
Matias Soto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Matias Soto
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
13
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Matias Soto
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
16
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
97
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Daniel Antonio Nunez
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
5
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Ryan Augusto dos Santos
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
4
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Mateo Branc
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Matias Soto
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Matias Soto
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Matias Soto
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Christian Langmo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
17
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Pranav Kumar
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
52%
(
52 of
100)
11
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
11
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Christian Langmo
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
11
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Meecah Bigun
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
12
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dian Nedev
Player
Christian Langmo
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
7
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
6
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Christian Langmo
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
79%
(
84 of
107)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
52 of
84)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
107
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Christian Langmo
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
8
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
7
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
26 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Soto Vs Langmo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Matias Soto
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Christian Langmo
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
